Exploring the Void Between Planning from Above and Planning from Below
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2026.02.001Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Klaus R. Kunzmann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Keywords:
Regional Planning, Strategic Spatial Planning, Regional Governance, Regional Laboratories, European Cohesion PolicyAbstract
This paper argues that regional planning has lost much of its practical relevance as strategic decision-making has become increasingly centralised while participatory governance has shifted attention toward the local scale. Positioned between top-down regulation and bottom-up initiatives, the regional level has become an underexplored arena of spatial planning. Drawing on debates in strategic spatial planning and regional governance, the paper revisits the role of planners as facilitators, moderators, and agents of transformation rather than producers of regulatory plans. It proposes a renewed approach to regional development based on cooperation between actors from above and below, combining public support, civil-society engagement, and experimental governance. Building on examples such as the German Internationale Bauausstellungen (IBAs), the paper advances the concept of regional laboratories as temporary, flexible institutions capable of addressing complex territorial challenges beyond administrative boundaries. Finally, it argues for a reorientation of European cohesion policy toward strategically selected functional regions of European significance, where collaborative experimentation can foster innovation, resilience, competitiveness, and territorial cohesion. The paper concludes that the future of regional planning lies not in restoring traditional hierarchical approaches but in creating institutional spaces that connect strategic vision, local initiative, and transformative action.
References
Albrechts, Louis (1999) ‘Planners as catalysts and initiators of change: The new structure plan for Flanders’, European Planning Studies, 7(5), pp. 587–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720540
Albrechts, Louis (2010) ‘How to enhance creativity, diversity and sustainability in spatial planning: Strategic planning revisited’, in Cerreta, Maria, Concilio, Grazia and Monno, Valeria (eds.) Making Strategies in Spatial Planning. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3106-8_1
Albrechts, Louis (2025) ‘Embedded planning and planners: Rethinking the role of planning and planners in an era of undefined becoming’, in Moulaert, Frank and Mehmood, Abid (eds.) Exploring Regional Development and Land Use Strategies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 209–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035347926.00022
Albrechts, Louis (2027) ‘Strategic planning as a catalyst for transformative practice’, in Haselsberger, Beatrix (ed.) Encounters in Planning Thought: 18 Autobiographical .... [Publication details to be completed].
Harrison, John, Galland, Daniel and Tewdwr-Jones, Mark (2021) ‘Regional planning is dead: Long live planning regional futures’, Regional Studies, 55(1), pp. 6–18. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
Kloke, Andreas, Monheim, Heiner and Paetzel, Ulrich (2023) Karl Ganser: Integriertes Planen und Handeln. Dortmund: Kettler.
Kunzmann, Klaus R. (1995) ‘Developing the regional potential for creative response to structural change’, in Brotchie, John et al. (eds.) Cities in Competition: Productive and Sustainable Cities for the 21st Century. Australia: Longman, pp. 286–294.
Kunzmann, Klaus R. (2000) ‘Strategic spatial development through information and communication’, in Salet, Willem and Faludi, Andreas (eds.) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 259–266.
Kunzmann, Klaus R. (2004) ‘Creative brownfield redevelopment: The experience of the IBA Emscher Park initiative in the Ruhr in Germany’, in Greenstein, Rosalind and Sungu-Eryilmaz, Yesim (eds.) Recycling the City: The Use and Reuse of Urban Land. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 201–217.
Kunzmann, Klaus R. (2025) ‘When planners dream: Visions for European spatial development’, disP – The Planning Review, 61(1), pp. 81–99. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2025.2518863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2025.2518863
Lange, Bastian, Hülz, Martina, Schmid, Benedikt and Schulz, Christian (eds.) (2020) Postwachstums-Geographien: Raumbezüge diverser und alternativer Ökonomien. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451809
Lever, William and Bailly, Antoine (1995) The Spatial Impact of Economic Changes in Europe. Aldershot: Avebury.
Magnaghi, Alberto (2005) The Urban Village: A Charter for Democracy and Local Self-Sustainable Development. London: Zed Books.
Magnaghi, Alberto (2024) La Biorégion Urbaine: Petit traité sur le territoire, bien commun. Paris: Eterotopia.
Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung (MKRO) (2016) Leitbilder und Handlungsstrategien für die Raumentwicklung in Deutschland. Berlin: Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung.
Miosga, Manfred, Dudek, Sebastian and Klee, Andreas (eds.) (2022) Neue Perspektiven für eine zukunftsfähige Raumordnung in Bayern. Arbeitsberichte der ARL, No. 35. Hannover: Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
Moulaert, Frank and Mehmood, Abid (eds.) (2025) Exploring Regional Development and Land Use Strategies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Novy, Andreas and Dornis, Nina (2025) ‘Planning without hubris: Top-linked governance to empower bottom-linked initiatives’, in Moulaert, Frank and Mehmood, Abid (eds.) Exploring Regional Development and Land Use Strategies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 262–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035347926.00026
Stöhr, Walter B. (1981) ‘Development from below: The bottom-up and periphery-inward development paradigm’, in Development from Above or Below? The Dialectics of Regional Planning in Developing Countries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Weick, Thomas (2022) ‘Planung wiederentdecken: Raumplanung 2.0’, in Miosga, Manfred, Dudek, Sebastian and Klee, Andreas (eds.) Neue Perspektiven für eine zukunftsfähige Raumordnung in Bayern. Hannover: Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, pp. 151–162.
