Using Complexity to Broaden Understandings
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2026.02.005Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kobe Tilley, Tim Devos, Angelos Varvarousis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Keywords:
Temporary Use, Complexity Theory, Dichotomies, Adaptive PlanningAbstract
The utilisation of unoccupied space is becoming increasingly prevalent. This ‘practice’, known as Temporary Use of Space, is evolving and being used in more varied ways. Despite these developments, existent literature is lagging and often frames temporary use in terms of overly narrow dichotomies. While such distinctions may sharpen the debate, they can also obscure the complexity of contemporary dynamics. To address this, we draw on complexity theory to transcend dichotomous phrasings. After examining three common dichotomies, as well as a complexity-informed approach to temporary use, we analyse three emblematic cases from Flanders. Based on this perspective, we argue that dichotomies are insufficient for capturing the changing nature of temporary use. Thereafter, we propose understanding temporary use as an integral component of adaptive planning processes.
References
Allen, Peter M (2011). Cities: The visible expression of co-evolving complexity. In: Portugali, Juval, Han Meyer, Egbert Stolk & Ekim Tan (eds.) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design. Cham: Springer, pp.67-89. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_5
Antwerpen. (n.d.). RUP Slachthuissite - Noordschippersdok - Lobroekdok - Antwerpen. [Online] Available from: https://www.antwerpen.be/info/58e352cea67793014d67e1e0/rup-slachthuissite-noordschippersdok-lobroekdok Accessed [19/09/2024].
Archipel. (n.d.-a). Over Archipel. [Online] Available from: https://www.archipel.site/over-archipel Accessed [16/09/2024].
Archipel. (n.d.-b). Partners en netwerken. [Online] Available from: https://www.archipel.site/partners-en-netwerken Accessed [19/12/2025].
Berlanger, Dimitri (2018). Stad koopt Asiat-site voor 10 miljoen. Het Laatste Nieuws. [Online] Available from: https://www.hln.be/vilvoorde/stad-koopt-asiat-site-voor-10-miljoen~a1f55121/ Accessed [12/3/2026].
Boelens, Luuk & Gert De Roo (2016) Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning theory, 15, pp.42-67. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1473095214542631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214542631
Boonstra, Beitske (2015). Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship: A post-structuralist agenda for self-organization in spatial planning. InPlanning, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/322810.
Boonstra, Beitske & Luuk Boelens (2011) Self-organization in urban development: towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban research & practice, 4, pp.99-122. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17535069.2011.579767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.579767
Bragaglia, Francesca & Nadia Caruso (2022) Temporary uses: a new form of inclusive urban regeneration or a tool for neoliberal policy? Urban Research & Practice, 15, pp.194-214. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17535069.2020.1775284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1775284
Calzati, Stefano, Francisco Santos & Giulia Casarola (2022) On the (non) institutional disclosure of urban commons: Evidence, practices and challenges from the Netherlands and Belgium. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, pp.934604. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-cities/articles/10.3389/frsc.2022.934604/full. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.934604
Carlton, Sally & Suzanne Vallance (2017) The commons of the tragedy: Temporary use and social capital in Christchurch’s earthquake-damaged central city. Social Forces, 96, pp.831-850. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26563280?seq=1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox064
Chang, Robin (2022) ‘Temporal entertainment. Temporary use stabilisation in German & Dutch contexts of urban regeneration’ (unpublished PhD thesis), TU Dortmund University. https://eldorado.tu-dortmund.de/items/7d084665-9727-4748-acf1-6fbc9e2a2ec3.
Chang, Robin A (2021) How Do Scholars Communicate the’Temporary Turn’in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework. Urban Planning, 6, pp.133-145. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/72485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3613
Chettiparamb, Angelique (2019) Responding to a complex world: Explorations in spatial planning. Planning theory, 18, pp.429-447. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1473095218820554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218820554
Christensen, Karen S (1985) Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American planning association, 51, pp.63-73. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944368508976801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368508976801
Colomb, Claire (2012) Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of urban affairs, 34, pp.131-152. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00607.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00607.x
Cozzolino, Stefano & Stefano Moroni (2024). Action, property and beauty: Planning with and for emergent urban complexity. Taylor & Francis, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003454304/action-property-beauty-stefano-cozzolino-stefano-moroni. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003454304
De Roo, Gert (2016). Spatial planning, complexity and a world ‘out of equilibrium’: Outline of a non-linear approach to planning. In: De Roo, Gert, Jean Hillier & Joris Van Wezemael (eds.) Complexity and planning. London: Routledge, pp.141-176. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315573199-8/spatial-planning-complexity-world-equilibrium-gert-de-roo.
de Roo, Gert (2020). Introduction to the Handbook on Planning and Complexity. In: De Roo, Gert, Claudia Yamu & Christian Zuidema (eds.) Handbook on Planning and Complexity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.1-18. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/introduction-to-the-handbook-on-planning-and-complexity/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439185
de Roo, Gert & Ward S Rauws (2011). Positioning planning in the world of order, chaos and complexity: On perspectives, behaviour and interventions in a non-linear environment. In: Portugali, Juval, Han Meyer, Egbert Stolk & Ekim Tan (eds.) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design. Cham: Springer, pp.207-220. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_12
De Smet, Aurelie (2013) The role of temporary use in urban (re) development: examples from Brussels. Brussels Studies. La revue scientifique pour les recherches sur Bruxelles/ Het wetenschappelijk tijdschrift voor onderzoek over Brussel/ The Journal of Research on Brussels. https://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1196.
Deas, Iain, Michael Martin & Stephen Hincks (2021) Temporary urban uses in response to COVID-19: bolstering resilience via short-term experimental solutions. Town Planning Review, 92, pp.81-88. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/abs/10.3828/tpr.2020.45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.45
Devos, Tim (2021) Government Planners and Critical Planning Practices as Allies: Tactics for Socio-Spatial Planning Innovations. disP-The Planning Review, 57, pp.30-45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02513625.2021.1981009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.1981009
Devos, Tim & Luuk Boelens (2024) The double connection: towards a bi-directional notion of participation. disP-The Planning Review, 60, pp.4-20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02513625.2024.2376443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2024.2376443
Dubeaux, Sarah & Emmanuèle Cunningham Sabot (2018) Maximizing the potential of vacant spaces within shrinking cities, a German approach. Cities, 75, pp.6-11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275116303006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.015
Ferreri, Mara (2015) The seductions of temporary urbanism. ephemera, 15, pp.181. https://www.ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/issue/15-1ephemera-feb15.pdf#page=182.
Ferreri, Mara (2021). The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism: Normalising Precarity in Austerity London. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, https://books.google.be/books?id=6REfEAAAQBAJ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1hp5hhs
Galdini, Rossana (2020) Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome. Cities, 96, pp.102445. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275118314227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102445
Gent, Stad (2017). Mondelinge vraag van raadslid Astrid De Bruycker: Stand van zaken Meibloemsite. [Online] Available from: https://ebesluitvorming.gent.be/zittingen/17.0602.6367.5027/agendapunten/17.0608.6442.6194 Accessed [19/12/2025].
Gent, Stad (2019a). Addendum bij de ‘Bijzondere samenwerkingsovereenkomst Meibloemsite: verwerving, sloop fase 1 en beheer tijdelijke invulling’ - Goedkeuring. 2019_GRMW_00017 [Online] Available from: https://ebesluitvorming.gent.be/zittingen/18.1218.3796.5717/agendapunten/19.0110.6948.3569 Accessed [19/12/2025].
Gent, Stad (2019b). Subsidieovereenkomst voor investeringskosten aan het artistiek en sociaal centrum De Meubelfabriek, Brugse Poort – werkingsjaar 2019 - Goedkeuring. 2019_GRMW_01172 [Online] Available from: https://ebesluitvorming.gent.be/zittingen/19.0502.5359.4084/agendapunten/19.1031.2410.2439 Accessed [19/12/2025].
Gent, Stad (2019c). Tijdelijke invulling ‘De Meubelfabriek’ start op de Meibloemsite. https://persruimte.stad.gent/171471-tijdelijke-invulling-de-meubelfabriek-start-op-de-meibloemsite/.
Gent, Stad (2020). Subsidieovereenkomst voor algemene werkingskosten en investeringskosten aan het artistiek en sociaal centrum De Meubelfabriek, Brugse Poort – werkingsjaren 2020-2023 - Goedkeuring. 2020_GRMW_00951 [Online] Available from: https://ebesluitvorming.gent.be/zittingen/19.1125.0279.6986/agendapunten/20.0910.5726.6789 Accessed [19/12/2025].
Gent, Stad (2023). Subsidieovereenkomst voor algemene werkingskosten aan het artistiek en sociaal centrum De Meubelfabriek, Brugse Poort – werkingsjaren 2023-2025 - Goedkeuring. 2023_GR_00779 [Online] Available from: https://ebesluitvorming.gent.be/zittingen/23.0220.3622.6436/agendapunten/23.0828.2980.8986 Accessed [19/12/2025].
Gent, Stad. (n.d.). Zuurstof voor de Brugse Poort. Stadsvernieuwingsproject. Herwaardering van de negentiende-eeuwse gordel rond de stad. [Online] Available from: https://stad.gent/nl/zuurstof-voor-de-brugse-poort/stadsvernieuwingsproject Accessed [19/12/2025].
Hernberg, Hella (2022) Holding properties vacant is resource stupidity’: Towards a typology of roles in the (inter) mediation of urban ‘Temporary Use. Planning Practice & Research, 37, pp.581-600. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02697459.2021.2001730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.2001730
Hillier, Jean (2016) Strategic spatial planning in uncertainty or planning indeterminate futures?: A critical review. Situated Practices of Strategic Planning, pp.298-316. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315679181-22/strategic-spatial-planning-uncertainty-planning-indeterminate-futures-jean-hillier.
Hoefkens, Silke & Thomas Machiels (2025) Adaptive planning in regulatory planning systems: balancing rigidity and adaptability in Oude Dokken, Ghent. Planning Practice & Research, pp.1-22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02697459.2025.2504948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2025.2504948
Honeck, Thomas (2017) From squatters to creatives. An innovation perspective on temporary use in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18, pp.268-287. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649357.2017.1303536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1303536
Innes, Judith E & David E Booher (2018). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203864302/planning-complexity-judith-innes-david-booher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147949
Jaspers, Sylke & Trui Steen (2020) The sustainability of outcomes in temporary co-production. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33, pp.62-77. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijpsm-05-2019-0124/full/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2019-0124
Kamvasinou, Krystallia (2016). Reimagining interim landscapes. Emerging Landscapes. London: Routledge, pp.147-159. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315579184-18/reimagining-interim-landscapes-krystallia-kamvasinou.
Lacoere, Peter (2023). Van groei naar grens: Ruimteneutraliteit en bouwshift als doelstellingen van duurzaam landgebruik. Antwerpen: Gompel & Svacina, https://gompel-svacina.eu/product/van-groei-naar-grens/.
Lehtovuori, Panu & Sampo Ruoppila (2017). Temporary uses producing difference in contemporary urbanism. In: Henneberry, John (ed.) Transience and permanence in urban development. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, pp.47-63. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119055662.ch4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119055662.ch4
Luhmann, Niklas (1984) The self-description of society: crisis fashion and sociological theory. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, pp.59-72. https://brill.com/edcollchap/book/9789004478008/B9789004478008_s006.xml. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004478008_006
Machiels, Thomas, Tine Compernolle & Tom Coppens (2021) Explaining uncertainty avoidance in megaprojects: Resource constraints, strategic behaviour, or institutions? Planning Theory & Practice, 22, pp.537-555. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649357.2021.1944659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1944659
Matoga, Agnes (2019) Governance of temporary use. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 172, pp.159-168. https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/full/10.1680/jurdp.18.00052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.18.00052
Meeus, Bruno, Tim Devos & Seppe De Blust (2016). The politics of nostalgia in urban redevelopment projects: The case of antwerp-dam. In: Karner, Christian & Bernhard Weicht (eds.) The Commonalities of Global Crises: Markets, Communities and Nostalgia. Cham: Springer, pp.249-269. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-50273-5_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50273-5_10
Moore-Cherry, Niamh & Linda Mccarthy (2016) Debating temporary uses for vacant urban sites: Insights for practice from a stakeholder workshop. Planning Practice & Research, 31, pp.347-357. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02697459.2016.1158075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1158075
Moroni, Stefano & Daniele Chiffi (2021). Complexity and uncertainty: implications for urban planning. In: Portugali, Juval (ed.) Handbook on cities and complexity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.319-330. https://www.academia.edu/43456256/Complexity_and_Uncertainty_Implications_for_Urban_Planning_Handbook_on_Cities_and_Complexity_. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789900125.00027
Nedučin, Dejana & Milena Krklješ (2022) Culture-led regeneration of industrial brownfield hosting temporary uses: A post-socialist context–case study from novi sad, Serbia. Sustainability, 14, pp.16150. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316150
Németh, Jeremy & Joern Langhorst (2014) Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities, 40, pp.143-150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275113000486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.007
O’Callaghan, Cian (2023) Rethinking vacancy within the urbanization process: towards a new research agenda. Urban Geography, pp.1-20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02723638.2023.2233862.
Orbaşlı, Aylin & Joanna Karmowska (2020) Temporariness in Architectural Regeneration. Architectural Regeneration, pp.169-187. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119340379.ch8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119340379.ch8
Oswalt, Philipp, Misselwitz Philipp & Klaus Overmeyer (2006). Patterns of the unplanned: urban catalyst. In: Franck, Karen & Quentin Stevens (eds.) Loose Space. London: Routledge, pp.271-288. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799574-18/patterns-unplanned-philipp-oswalt-misselwitz-philipp-klaus-overmeyer.
Overheid, Vlaamse. (n.d.). Vilvoorde - Voortgang: Een kloppend hart voor de Asiat-site. [Online] Available from: https://www.vlaanderen.be/stedenbeleid/verhalen/vilvoorde-voortgang-een-kloppend-hart-voor-de-asiat-site Accessed [19/12/2025].
Patti, Daniela & Levente Polyak (2015) From practice to policy: frameworks for temporary use. Urban Research & Practice, 8, pp.122-134. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011422
Porter, Mr Geoff & Gert De Roo (2012). Fuzzy planning: the role of actors in a fuzzy governance environment. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., https://books.google.be/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=-i8JsKQoeOQC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=de+roo+2012&ots=lYiOi-KIXa&sig=Re_JKQ5X2XxmYnFFffCnv9ZR8u0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=de%20roo%202012&f=false.
Portugali, Juval (2011). Complexity theories of cities: Implications to urban planning. Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design. Cham: Springer, pp.221-244. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_13
Portugali, Juval, Han Meyer, Egbert Stolk & Ekim Tan (2012) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: an overview with implications to urban planning and design. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2
Pumain, Denise (2021). Co-evolution as the secret of urban complexity. In: Portugali, Juval (ed.) Handbook on cities and complexity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.136-153. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781789900118/9781789900118.00015.xml. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789900125.00015
Rauws, Ward (2017) Embracing uncertainty without abandoning planning: Exploring an adaptive planning approach for guiding urban transformations. DisP-The Planning Review, 53, pp.32-45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02513625.2017.1316539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.1316539
Respondent_01 (2024). ‘Interview over Asiat-park’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 19/09/2024), Vilvoorde.
Respondent_02 (2024). ‘Interview over Archipel’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 20/09/2024), Online.
Respondent_03 & Respondent_04 (2024). ‘Interview over De Meubelfabriek - tweede tijdelijke invulling’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 24/09/2024), Ghent.
Respondent_04 (2025). ‘Interview over De Meubelfabriek - tweede tijdelijke invulling - opvolggesprek’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 07/02/2025), Online.
Respondent_05 (2024). ‘Interview over Onkruid en Asiat-park’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 27/09/2024), Online.
Respondent_05 (2025). ‘Interview over Onkruid en Asiat-park - opvolggesprek’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 06/02/2025), Online.
Respondent_06 (2025). ‘Interview over De Meubelfabriek - eerste tijdelijke invulling’ (Interview by Tilley, Kobe, 02/04/2025), Ghent.
Silva, Paulo (2016) Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 43, pp.1040-1051. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265813516657340?casa_token=UlzN8jltXuYAAAAA%3A8-zrV51QXHWeBYwZ70HEO6Aikv_XofWb8saKpxVucr45u3eO9K0wmjCfQCLnwEYibzba3IEl2CE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516657340
sogent. (n.d.). Meibloemsite. Een tweede leven voor de vroegere bowling en meubelwinkel. [Online] Available from: https://sogent.be/projecten/meibloemsite Accessed [19/12/2025].
Staes, Bert (2012). Bowling Meibloemstraat is opnieuw gekraakt. Nieuwsblad. [Online] Available from: https://www.nieuwsblad.be/regio/oost-vlaanderen/regio-gent/gent/bowling-meibloemstraat-is-opnieuw-gekraakt/58723866.html Accessed [12/3/2026].
Tonkiss, Fran (2013) Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city. City, 17, pp.312-324. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13604813.2013.795332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.795332
Turku, Veera, Mikko Kyrönviita, Ari Jokinen & Pekka Jokinen (2023) Exploring the catalytic power of temporary urbanism through a binary approach. Cities, 133, pp.104145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275122005844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104145
Vallance, Suzanne, Ann Dupuis, David Thorns & Sarah Edwards (2017) Temporary use and the onto-politics of ‘public’ space. Cities, 70, pp.83-90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275116305807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.023
Van Assche, Kristof, Raoul Beunen & Martijn Duineveld (2017). Co-evolutionary planning theory: Evolutionary governance theory and its relatives. The Routledge handbook of planning theory. London: Routledge, pp.221-233. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315696072-18/co-evolutionary-planning-theory-kristof-van-assche-raoul-beunen-martijn-duineveld. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696072-18
Vermeiren, Karolien, Lien Poelmans, Ann Pisman, Stijn Vanacker, Peter Willems & Guy Engelen (2019) Kernen, linten, verspreide bebouwing in Vlaanderen. https://archief.algemeen.omgeving.vlaanderen.be/xmlui/handle/acd/229668.
Vilvoorde. (n.d. ). RUP Asiat-Darse. [Online] Available from: https://www.vilvoorde.be/rup-asiat-darse Accessed [19/09/2024].
Wohl, Sharon (2018) Tactical urbanism as a means of testing relational processes in space: A complex systems perspective. Planning Theory, 17, pp.472-493. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1473095217722809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217722809
